School tests boycott 'breaches contracts'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TEACHERS will be in breach of their contracts and of their statutory duty if they boycott national testing, the High Court was told yesterday, writes Judith Judd.
Wandsworth council in south London is seeking an injunction to stop the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers boycotting national curriculum assessment and testing. If it goes ahead, tests for 14-year-olds next term will be worst affected because most of the union's members work in secondary schools. The union says testing imposes an excessive workload on teachers.
Patrick Elias QC, for Wandsworth, said children 'had been caught in the crossfire of the guerrilla warfare' between the Secretary of State for Education and the union. The 1988 Education Reform Act placed teachers under a statutory duty to carry out national curriculum assessments and testing.
In an affidavit read in court, Donald Naismith, Wandsworth's chief education officer, said the boycott would disrupt tests for 14-year-olds in some of the borough's secondary schools. The council claims that the union is not engaged in a trade dispute with a minister, which is allowed under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Nigel de Gruchy, the union's general secretary, said in an affidavit which was read to the court: 'There is a genuine dispute with the Secretary of State over the workload involved in the assessment and testing of the national curriculum.'
The case continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments