School marking plan to break tests boycott
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN PATTEN, Secretary of State for Education, is proposing external marking of national curriculum tests for 14-year-olds to try to break the teachers' test boycott.
The disclosure of the plan, which could cost up to pounds 30m, is expected today. It will divide teachers who have boycotted tests at 7 and 14 for two years in protest against the extra workload.
Mr Patten hopes to escape further political embarrassment by adopting a 'carrot and stick' policy. He is conceding the demand of one union that external markers rather than teachers should mark the tests while examining ways of penalising schools that fail to do tests.
Only one of the six teacher unions continued the boycott this year but fewer than 10 per cent of schools are thought to have completed the tests for 14-year-olds and reported the results. The figures for 7- and 11-year-olds are higher.
Ministers are considering withholding grants for activ ities such as in-service training from recalcitrant schools. Another option would be to inspect such schools more often. Mr Patten said last week they would not be given money to expand and were more likely to face closure.
Teachers are divided about the merits of external marking, which would probably be done by exam boards.
John Sutton, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, questioned whether it would end the boycott: 'It doesn't seem to me that it addresses the central issue of what kind of testing should be done at this level. The last thing we need is another expensive bureaucracy marking tests. Assessing pupils at this age is the business of teachers.'
A spokeswoman for the National Union of Teachers, which is still boycotting the test, said: 'Those marking the tests need to know the children. External marking would have some impact on workload but there is still the question of the tests' educational invalidity.'
But Eamonn O'Kane, deputy general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers, said: 'If external marking were introduced that would remove our last major problem with the workload involved in the tests.'
He added that the workload of assessing pupils in class for the national curriculum remained a problem.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments