Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sale plan raises air safety fears

Christian Wolmar
Tuesday 05 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AIR traffic controllers warned yesterday that plans to privatise the service would jeopardise passenger safety, writes Christian Wolmar.

Responding to a government consultation paper outlining plans to privatise National Air Traffic Services, unions representing controllers argue that pressure to cut costs will lead to longer hours and lower safety standards.

They are meeting John MacGregor, Secretary of State for Transport, today to ask him to reconsider privatisation plans. The consultation period ends this month and legislation is likely to be in the Queen's Speech in November for a sale late next year or early in 1996.

Joe Magee, the aviation officer for IPMS, representing 4,000 workers, criticised the plan to award a contract to a private body: 'Such a contract will force NATS to make productivity gains to satisfy demands for profits. This can only mean reductions in staffing levels and cuts in equipment and training.'

Unions also said there could be conflicts of interest involving companies who bought shares in NATS, such as airlines, which would want priority for their services.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in