Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Safety check for crop with 'foreign' genes: Approval sought for 'altered' oilseed rape

Susan Watts,Science Correspondent
Monday 18 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GOVERNMENT advisers meet today to decide whether a genetically engineered crop plant is safe enough to go on sale.

If the committee clears the new type of oilseed rape it will be the first such artificially altered crop to be approved for the British market, changing the scale of genetic crop development from small experimental plots to mass production.

This has alarmed environmental campaigners, who argue that little is known about the effect 'foreign' genes in crops will have when the engineered plants that carry them are planted en masse. The rape plants could cross with wild plants, transferring their genes and risking the spread of herbicide resistance to weeds.

Julie Hill, director of the Green Alliance and member of the Advisory Committee on Release to the Environment (Acre), which will consider the proposal, said: 'Greenpeace is highlighting concerns that Acre has known for a long time it would have to deal with, once such engineered plants moved from research to commercialisation, because at this point the inserted genes will almost certainly be spread in the environment.'

The new plants, created by Plant Genetic Systems, (PGS) a Belgian biotechnology company, have extra genes taken from tobacco and four bacteria. The male plants of the line are engineered to be sterile, preventing further cross-breeding.

One of the foreign genes makes the plants resistant to a herbicide called Basta. The plants also carry a gene that renders them resistant to an antibiotic.

Oilseed rape is the bright yellow crop used in margarine, vegetable oil, detergents and animal feed.

Greenpeace objects to the use of resistant crops which it claims tie farmers into using harmful chemicals. But Dr Anne-Marie Bouckaert, director of the technology planning and protection division at PGS, has said that although one herbicide would be used more often, it would replace others which are more harmful to the environment.

Greenpeace is also unhappy because conferring Basta resistance on crops involves adding only a single gene. The anxiety is that this increases the likelihood of the gene 'escaping' and passing into other species via pollen.

Dr Bouckaert has said cross-pollination between wild species and cultured crops occurs in very few cases. The fact that the Basta transformation involved only one gene would make it easier to track the gene if it jumped into other species.

The PGS oilseed rape has already raised objections from those opposed to patents on life. In 1990, the European Patent Office granted PGS a patent on its Basta-resistant oilseed rape - the first it had granted on a herbicide-resistant crop.

Opponents also have economic objections. They point out that the Basta herbicide is manufactured by Hoechst, sold in the UK as Challenge. PGS has granted Hoechst exclusive rights to exploit its resistant crops, and environmentalists argue that this type of 'monopoly' control over genetic resources should not be trusted to any individual, and certainly not to a multinational corporation.

But PGS says Hoechst is not a seed company, so is not yet in a position to set up a full monopoly - selling both herbicide-resistant seed and the herbicide.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in