Royal Family do not attract US tourists, survey says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE assertion that Britain needs the Royal Family to attract tourists has been challenged by an opinion poll in the US.
If Britain were to become a republic, actors or even stuffed dummies could be used to play the part of the Royal Family and tourists would still be keen to come to Britain, according to a readers' survey by the US magazine, Conde Nast Traveler.
Over 75 per cent of those surveyed said that the royals 'do not play any part in a decision to visit Britain'. Nine out of 10 said they would still visit Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle even if they were not occupied by royalty.
The magazine reports: 'It is the fabric of royalty - the palaces, the castles, the military ritual - that pulls in the visitors, not the Queen herself and her troubled brood.'
However, three-quarters of its readers said they would 'cross the street to see a member of the Royal Family if one were at hand'.
Americans rate a visit to Buckingham Palace - due to open its doors to tourists for the first time next month - as highly as a trip to the White House. 'All this suggests that the trappings of royalty give Britain some of the qualities of a theme park,' Traveler magazine says.
'The majestic buildings, the parades and such relics of ancient bloodbaths as the Tower of London are royalty's contribution to the theatre of Britain, to the idea of seeing and touching hundreds of years of history.'
The magazine claims that the current 'cast of royals' have descended to the level of soap opera and are 'merely incidental to the permanent props'.
'As at Disneyland and other theme parks, actors could just as easily play the parts deemed essential to the franchise. Or, more cheaply, stuffed dummies.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments