Starmer faces more backbench pressure over ‘heinous’ and ‘sexist’ benefit cap
Rosie Duffield likened the policy to the dystopian world of The Handmaid’s Tale, in which women’s rights have been taken away.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir Keir Starmer has come under further pressure to scrap the two-child benefit limit as another of his backbench MPs described the policy as “heinous”.
Writing in The Times, Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield said the policy, introduced by then-chancellor George Osborne in 2015, was “sinister and overtly sexist” and had been the main reason driving her to stand for Parliament.
She said: “The obvious target is the caricature of the ‘feckless’, ‘irresponsible’ people who drop children every few minutes without being able to pay for them, but the subtext is altogether more sinister: it is an attack on women’s right to choose how many children they have.”
Subjugated according to their social class
Ms Duffield criticised the so-called “rape clause” which provides an exception for children conceived through an attack, saying: “The authors of this policy are telling women: disclose to a series of total strangers that your third or any subsequent children are the result of rape and we will pay you after all.”
Likening the policy to the dystopian society in Margaret Attwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale, in which women are deprived of their rights, Ms Duffield said women were being “subjugated according to their social class”.
The new Government has already come under pressure to abolish the cap from campaigners, opposition parties and some of its own backbenchers, with some rebel Labour MPs set to move an amendment to the King’s Speech calling for the policy to be scrapped.
The Government has announced a taskforce to develop a child poverty strategy, led by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, although many of the charities consulted by Ms Kendall earlier in the week have also called for the cap to be abolished.
We were clear in our manifesto that the economic circumstances do not currently allow for us to abolish the cap
Ministers have previously suggested the state of the public finances means they cannot afford to abolish the cap.
Commons Leader Lucy Powell told MPs on Thursday: “As an incoming Labour Government, we are absolutely committed to tackling child poverty and all the root causes of child poverty, which is why the Prime Minister announced the Government taskforce looking at these matters yesterday.
“We were clear in our manifesto that the economic circumstances do not currently allow for us to abolish the cap.
“Economic stability is the single biggest thing we can do to ensure that children don’t fall into poverty, because when the economy crashes, it’s the poorest in society who pay the heaviest price.”