Health Secretary defends Sunak over claims he blocked Raac hospital rebuilds
The PM is reported to have blocked plans to rebuild five hospitals riddled with collapse-prone reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete in 2020.
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Rishi Sunak is under pressure over fresh claims that as chancellor he denied funding to re-build public buildings hit by crumbling concrete.
It comes after The Guardian reported that the Prime Minister blocked plans to rebuild five hospitals riddled with collapse-prone reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) in 2020.
The paper said that only two of seven hospital rebuilding projects backed by the Department for Health were given Treasury approval in the 2020 spending review.
Health Secretary Steve Barclay branded the claim “inaccurate”, but did appear to concede that the remaining five hospitals were only added to a rebuilding programme at a later stage.
The Government has said that the full extent of the Raac issues were unknown until an independent report by engineering consultants Mott MacDonald last year.
“What Rishi Sunak as chancellor put in place was a £700 million fund for replacement – that was put in place from 2021,” Mr Barclay told Sky News.
“In fact, we were on this issue early, we were surveying hospitals from 2019 and we’ve been following the Institute for Structural Engineers’ advice, which is that not all Raac has to be replaced.
“What we need to do is monitor it, assess it, and where there is a concern with deterioration then it does need to be replaced.
“And that’s why a £700 million fund was put in place – two schemes for full replacement of those hospitals were agreed – but further work was then commissioned and a study from (Mott) MacDonald was then commissioned to assess the other five hospitals.
“Once we got that information, those schemes have then come into the programme – so a significant investment, specifically in Raac.”
A spokesman for the Government also said that the claims were “untrue”.
“The funding was not rejected by the Treasury, or the Chancellor and Chief Secretary at the time, and there was an agreement to link these decisions into the wider New Hospitals Programme.”
But Opposition parties have called for an explanation from the Prime Minister.
It is the latest funding decision to raise awkward questions for Mr Sunak, after he was accused of having declined a request for funding to rebuild more schools during his time in the Treasury.
Ministers remain under pressure over the issue of Raac, with concerns about the state of school buildings renewing scrutiny over the presence of the material in other public buildings and infrastructure.
The Lib Dems called the latest news a “disgrace”.
Health spokesperson Daisy Cooper said: “The Prime Minister has put the public’s health and safety at risk for far too long.
“It’s outrageous that the Conservatives have actively ignored this issue for years.
“Rishi Sunak’s fingerprints are all over this concrete crisis. He must come to Parliament and explain why he blocked plans to rebuild crumbling hospitals, putting patients and staff at risk.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.