Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Retrial for prisoner in police cell death case

Rachel Borrill
Saturday 20 February 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A MAN convicted for the murder of his cellmate in a London police station and who claims the police framed him, was granted a retrial by the Court of Appeal yesterday.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Taylor, sitting with Mr Justice Judge and Mr Justice Hidden, quashed the conviction and ordered new charges to be brought within two months. Lord Taylor said they could not be sure the original trial jury would have reached the same verdict if they had heard the new evidence. 'Accordingly, we cannot say the verdict is safe and satisfactory.'

Malcolm Kennedy, 45, of Stoke Newington, north-east London, was jailed for life in September 1991 for allegedly battering Patrick Quinn to death after both men had been detained for drunkenness. Mr Quinn's injuries were consistent with someone jumping on his chest, crushing his heart.

Lord Taylor said evidence from Samantha Wilson and Sara Dennis, new witnesses who were traced after the trial, contradicted police evidence. PC Paul Giles, of Hammersmith police station, said he arrested Mr Quinn and took him to the station between 11pm and midnight on 23 December 1990. But Ms Wilson said PC Giles arrested her boyfriend for assault at 11.50pm, an hour earlier than police officers claimed at the trial. Police documents found after the trial supported her evidence.

The whole of the evidence, including the new material, merited consideration by a fresh jury, Lord Taylor said. 'In our judgment, onerous though it will be for all concerned, this is a case in which the interests of justice require that we order a retrial.'

Lord Taylor described Mr Quinn's murder as a 'motiveless crime'. The prosecution alleged that Kennedy, in his drunken stupor, had subjected Mr Quinn to a manic and unprovoked attack. Blood was spattered on Kennedy's shoes, socks and trousers. His bootprints were on Mr Quinn's clothing, his scarf was draped across the body and his watch lay by the dead man's head.

At his trial, Kennedy alleged he was woken by a police officer beating Mr Quinn. When he tried to intervene, the officer punched him unconscious. Kennedy maintains that officers then planted evidence to incriminate him. 'It was contended that a cover-up operation had been organised by the police to suppress the truth and to use Kennedy as a scapegoat,' Lord Taylor said.

He added that the judgment should be seen as impartial. 'We must not be taken, by ordering a retrial, to have reached any conclusion as to the suggested malpractice of the police. Equally . . . it must not be taken as indicating a view adverse to the appellant.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in