Protection urged for Thames estuary
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE THAMES ESTUARY and the hundreds of thousands of birds which depend on it must be protected from damaging development, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds urges in a report published today.
Port installations, rubbish dumps and industry have left much of the estuary an eyesore and during the postwar years many of its traditional, wildlife-rich grazing marshes have been ploughed up for cereals.
But, says the society, it remains Britain's most important estuary for birds. Nearly 300,000 wading birds and wildfowl spend the winter on its mudflats and marshes and many more stop there to feed and rest during their migrations between Arctic breeding grounds and warmer climes.
The report urges Michael Howard, Secretary of State for the Environment, to bring together local and central government to draw up a strategy for its future, including riverside councils, the National Rivers Authority and English Nature, the Government's nature conservation arm.
The RSPB and other environmental organisations have been worried by the East Thames Corridor initiative - plans for large-scale housing, leisure and industrial development along both banks of the estuary promoted enthusiastically by Michael Heseltine, Mr Howard's predecessor at Environment.
They fear that once economic growth resumes, a building boom east of London Docklands will destroy large areas of remaining natural habitat, along with large transport developments like a new motorway crossing - under consideration by the Department of Transport - and the Channel tunnel rail link.
Rising sea levels also threaten the estuary's saltmarshes. The eastern coast is sinking slowly and while in the past the marshes could have moved gradually inland, sea walls now prevent this.
The conservationists won a victory in July when Mr Howard decided to reject plans for a large development on the Isle of Sheppey on the Kent side of the estuary. The plans by Lionhope (Kent) were for housing and leisure facilities in Minster and Queenborough, a business park and extension of the docks in Sheerness and a business and industrial park nearby at Ridham.
The developer has now gone into receivership and the receiver is challenging Mr Howard's decision, made after a public inquiry, in the courts.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments