Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Probation for teenager after 'horrific assault'

Thursday 31 March 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A 17-YEAR-OLD boy who seriously injured an elderly Sikh in an unprovoked attack escaped a five-year custodial sentence yesterday and will instead spend the next two years at a residential home.

Maidstone Crown Court was told that last April, the boy then 16, was cycling along a footpath when he confronted Avtar Singh Gill, 61, near his home in Gravesend, Kent. He repeatedly bludgeoned him with a plank of wood. A witness said the boy laughed as his victim fell to the ground.

The boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, admitted causing grievous bodily harm with intent and was given probation.

Judge Felix Waley gave him three years' probation on condition that he stay at Frontier House, Sandwich, Kent, after being persuaded that he had made great progress there during the past 10 months and would benefit from being there for another two years.

John Persich, of Frontier House said when the boy went there he was 'a very angry young man'. 'He was placed on a programme and at first resisted. But we don't take resistance lightly,' he said. 'I am absolutely amazed at the progress he has made. We did a little bit of anger management because we felt that is where the problem lay. He has a big heart on wanting to succeed.'

Judge Waley questioned sending the boy there. He said: 'What bothers me is your brochure shows all the pleasures on offer. I am not criticising that. But can the community tolerate what he has done by way of a penalty looking forward to canoeing, volleyball and all the sports on offer as a way of serving a sentence?'

Richard Travers, for the defence, said the boy 'regrets enormously' what he had done. Difficulties at home had caused problems which led to the 'horrific' attack.

He said the most 'advantageous' course would be to return the boy to Frontier House where he had made great progress, although he understood the court might not consider this to be sufficiently punitive.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in