Vennells felt ‘uncomfortable’ during High Court case brought by Bates
More than 550 claimants brought the group legal action against the Post Office over the Horizon IT system between 2017 and 2019.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former Post Office boss Paula Vennells felt “uncomfortable” during the High Court case brought by lead campaigner Alan Bates and admitted the judgments made for “unacceptable reading”.
The case, known as the group litigation, racked up bills which Mr Justice Fraser considered to be “expensive” and subpostmasters have previously accused the Post Office of deploying a deliberate tactic to outspend them.
More than 550 claimants brought the group legal action against the Post Office over the Horizon IT system between 2017 and 2019.
Mr Justice Fraser concluded that the Horizon system contained a number of “bugs, errors and defects” and that there was a “material risk” that shortfalls in Post Office branch accounts were caused by the system.
At the Horizon IT inquiry on Friday, Sam Stein KC, on behalf of a number of subpostmasters, asked Ms Vennells: “You set the tone, didn’t you Ms Vennells?
“The tone was ‘Let’s eliminate them, let’s get rid of these bugs in the system – the subpostmasters’. That’s what you set in place, wasn’t it Ms Vennells?”
The former Post Office chief executive replied: “I did not set a culture like that. I did not lead the litigation.
“I had two conversations with Jane MacLeod (former Post Office general counsel and company secretary) and I’m disappointed… she can’t come and give evidence to the inquiry, because I think it is important that the inquiry understands more around the approach to the group litigation.
“I sat down with Jane twice on this to say I was very uncomfortable that the Post Office was going through this.”
Ms Vennells continued: “The Post Office didn’t call the group litigation, it was set in place by the postmasters, and I understand why, and I’m pleased that it was so that we’ve got to where we are today – but it wasn’t a policy I put in place.
“The questions I asked of Jane (MacLeod) on those two occasions were ‘This feels completely wrong to me, what can we do?’ (and) ‘We should not be in the process where we are fighting in court with subpostmasters’.”
I regret hugely the group litigation, and I’ve seen all of the paperwork behind it, and in view of the judgments that were taken and where we are today, it is unacceptable reading
Ms Vennells told the inquiry that the first time she asked the question, Ms MacLeod said the Post Office would try to settle the case, and the second time “the view the leading counsel, that we took… the only way to solve this was to take it through”.
She added: “I regret hugely the group litigation, and I’ve seen all of the paperwork behind it, and in view of the judgments that were taken and where we are today, it is unacceptable reading.”