Pop star granted photo injunction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE POP STAR Michael Jackson was granted a High Court injunction yesterday banning the Daily Mirror from republishing or circulating a close-up photograph of him taken at the opening concert of his European tour last month.
Mr Justice Millett granted the 33-year-old singer a 15-day ban preventing the Mirror breaching the terms of a photograph release agreement limiting the paper to only one use of the picture.
Robin Jacob QC, for Jackson's tour company TTC Touring Corporation, alleged the Mirror was conducting 'a vicious smear campaign' against the singer, whose UK concerts begin later this week.
Jackson has already launched a libel action against the newspaper in respect of the photograph and articles suggesting that his face has been 'hideously disfigured' by plastic surgery. Mr Jacob said that the photograph, which had appeared in papers in Germany and the United States, was 'unreal and unrepresentative'.
Charles Purle QC, for the Daily Mirror, said the photograph had already been seen by millions and the court should not grant an injunction to stifle comment on a matter of public interest. The Mirror intended to plead justification as its defence to the libel action.
The judge said the picture showed an image of Michael Jackson which was described as 'hideously distorted and disfigured', accompanied by a 'vitriolic attack' suggesting he had indulged in plastic surgery resulting from a tragic quest for perfect looks.
The judge said that on the evidence presented so far, the Mirror had shown no defence to Mr Jackson's claim and it should be prevented from re-using the photograph pending a further court hearing in 15 days time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments