Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Poor view' claim lost

Monday 22 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A ROCK concert promoter, Harvey Goldsmith, yesterday fought off a damages action in a test case brought by four music lovers.

Mr Goldsmith, who has handled chart-topping acts including the Rolling Stones and Madonna, was sued by four members of the audience at a concert by the rock group The Cure at the National Exhbition Centre, Birmingham, in November 1992.

Helen Bolton, a secretary, and Robert Skelding, an accountant, both of Halesowen, West Midlands, claimed the evening was ruined because a stack of public address equipment prevented them seeing more than two of the five band members from their top- price second-row seats.

During a four-hour hearing in chambers at Central London county court, they sought the return of their pounds 17.75 entry fees for themselves and two friends, and pounds 200 damages for 'disappointment'.

Lawyers regarded it as a test case of 'restricted viewing' litigation. But the claim was rejected because they had not complained about their seats on the night. The judge said that there was a complaints procedure, which they had not used.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in