Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Workers face £2,300 bill for tribunals

Nigel Morris
Thursday 15 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Workers could pay more than £2,300 to take an employer to an industrial tribunal under new measures that were last night condemned as a denial of justice for the lowest paid.

Ministers said the move was to trim the £84m cost of the tribunal system and ease pressure on businesses defending claims.

It follows proposals to double to two years the qualifying period for claiming unfair dismissal and suggestions that the smallest firms could be exempted from labour laws.

Unveiling the plans, Jonathan Djanogly, the justice minister, said the cost of tribunals was unsustainable and that the proposed fees, to be introduced in 2013-14, would spur businesses and workers to settle disagreements through mediation.

An employee could be charged £600 to lodge a claim, with an extra £1,750 fee for those seeking more than £30,000 in compensation.

The fees would be refunded where claimants won their cases.

Mr Djangoly claimed the charges would be waived for low earners.

But Brendan Barber, head of the TUC, said it would "prevent the poorest and most vulnerable workers from ever being able to get justice".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in