Unions win vote to reverse winter fuel cut in blow for Keir Starmer
The vote highlights major division within the Labour Party over the controversial policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Delegates at the annual Labour Party conference in Liverpool on Wednesday voted to reverse the introduction of āmeans-testing for theĀ winterĀ fuelĀ allowanceā as part of a union motion.
The vote will be seen as a blow for Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves, even though motions at the party conference are non-binding and the government is not required to respond to them. But it highlights major division within the party over the controversial policy.
Speaking to Channel 4 News after the debate, Sir Keir said he and his ministers had made āa difficult decision, taken because the last government left a Ā£22bn black holeā.
The PM said: āI do understand how, you know, colleagues in the Labour movement feel about this. This is clearly a difficult decision but a motion at conference doesnāt dictate government policy.ā
In July, Rachel ReevesĀ announced that older people not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits will no longer receiveĀ winter fuel paymentsĀ from this year onwards.
The decision came as part of aĀ series of spending cutsĀ to address a āblack holeā in the public finances left by the previous Conservative government announced in July by the chancellor.
The winter fuel payment is a payment of either Ā£200 or Ā£300 to help pensioners with their heating bills.
Around 10 million pensioners and 7 million pensioner households are expected to be affected by the changes. Ms Reeves and Sir Keir have argued that increases in the state pension will outweigh the cut, leaving pensioners better off than they are currently even without winter fuel payments.
The motion, which was passed by a show of hands, said: āBritain cannot wait for growth, nor turn back to failed austerity.
āWe need a vision where pensioners are not the first to face a new wave of cuts and those that profited from decades of deregulation finally help to rebuild Britain.ā
It also calls for an end to the āfiscal rules which prevent borrowing to investā brought in under the previous Tory government, as well as the introduction of wealth taxes to ensure there are āno further cuts to welfare provision for working people and pensionersā.
They propose taxing the top 1 per cent, equalising capital gains tax with income tax and imposing national insurance on investment income.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham has described the policy as ācruelā, urging the prime minister to admit he made a āmisstepā.
She said: āThe first thing Labour does is to take away the winter fuel allowance from the poorest in our society while they leave the wealthiest people pretty much untouched.ā
Speaking ahead of the vote on Wednesday morning, Ms Graham said: āI do not understand how our new Labour government can cut the winter fuel allowance for pensioners and leave the super-rich untouched.
āThis is not what people voted for. It is the wrong decision and needs to be reversed.
āFriends, we are the sixth richest economy in the world. We have the money. Britain needs investment, not austerity mark two. We wonāt get any gold badge for shaving peanuts off our debt.ā
Green Party co-leader Carla Denyer also stuck the boot in over the row, saying there is a āgoundswell of supportā for changing course on the policy.
She added: āTargeting some of the most vulnerable to fix the supposed black hole in the public finances is cruel and unnecessary.
āThere is another way. A fairer way. As the successful motion by Unite makes clear, taxing multi-millionaires and billionaires a little more would not only easily cover the cost of winter fuel payments for all pensioners but also generate additional funds for much needed investment in our health and social care services.ā
Simon Francis, End Fuel Poverty Coalition coordinator, said: āLabour conference has understood what ministers have failed to acknowledge, that removing the winter fuel payment at short notice and from so many people is wrong.ā
Labour will not U-turn on the policy despite the rebellion. A spokesperson said: āLabour was elected on our manifesto commitment to sound fiscal rules, economic growth is our primary mission and we will take the tough decisions now to rebuild Britain.ā
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments