Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

William Hague: Transitional deal is only way to save Brexit from an 'approaching disaster'

'Take all the risks together and there is the clear potential for Brexit to become the occasion of the greatest economic, diplomatic and constitutional muddle in the modern history of the UK,' former Foreign Secretary says

Chloe Farand
Tuesday 01 August 2017 17:11 BST
Comments
The former Foreign Secretary campaigned to remain in the EU
The former Foreign Secretary campaigned to remain in the EU (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A transitional deal is the only way to save Brexit from “an approaching disaster”, William Hague has said.

The former Foreign Secretary said he backed a managed withdrawal from the EU, as advocated by the Chancellor, Philip Hammond, which he described as having “immense attractions”.

Mr Hammond’s transition strategy of retaining free movement of labour until 2022 appears to have triggered a split in Theresa May’s Cabinet between those defending a soft Brexit and Eurosceptic hardliners.

The plan for an ”implementation” phase would also see the UK seeking to stay in the EU single market and customs union for three years after leaving the bloc.

Writing in The Telegraph, Lord Hague defended the proposal criticised by other cabinet members, including Brexiteer Liam Fox, the International Trade Secretary.

“This is seen by longstanding advocates of leaving as a ‘soft’ position or a climbdown. But in reality it is a plan to rescue Brexit from an approaching disaster,” Lord Hague said.

The former Tory leader was unequivocal when it came to stressing the risks the UK is taking as it prepares to exit the EU, including an economic downturn, instability for businesses, the difficulty to pass the final terms of the withdrawal deal in Parliament and the prospect of leaving the EU without an agreement altogether.

He wrote: “Take all these risks together and there is the clear potential for Brexit to become the occasion of the greatest economic, diplomatic and constitutional muddle in the modern history of the UK, with unknowable consequences for the country, the Government and the Brexit project itself.”

He argued that a transitional deal would make the negotiations with the EU easier and quicker, partly solving the row over the UK footing EU bills as it would keep making budget payments until 2021. It would also grant UK negotiators more time to set up a new customs system.

Lord Hague noted that fewer new laws would be needed in the short term, easing the pressure on businesses having to make decisions over jobs and income and making it more likely a united Government would succeed in passing through Parliament the terms of Britain’s departure.

Mr Hammond is understood to have the backing in Cabinet from the Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, and First Secretary, Damian Green.

But Mr Fox has rubbished the idea that Cabinet had agreed to allow free movement of labour three years after Brexit, saying any such move would “not keep faith” with the referendum result.

In the column, Lord Hague also revealed business leaders and politicians asked him how the UK would “get round” the EU referendum result. He claims he was asked the question “for months ... everywhere I went abroad”.

“I explained to them that this really is a democracy. The electorate voted to leave the EU, and therefore we leave,” he said.

He said that, like his former colleagues who voted Remain, he had to accept the result. But he warned both Brexiteers and the Government that underestimating the challenges ahead could see people turn against them and change their mind on Brexit.

“Now, there is a fresh danger that, with the referendum behind them, the enthusiasts for Brexit will underestimate the dangers that things could go so badly wrong that the country turns against the people trying to deliver what it voted for, or event the idea itself,” he wrote.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in