Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Whitehall programme aimed at identifying future threats, risks and opportunities for Britain, criticised in report

 

Zander Swinburne
Saturday 03 May 2014 23:16 BST
Comments
Miller, man of the future
Miller, man of the future

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Government programme aimed at identifying future threats, risks and opportunities for the UK has "substantial weaknesses" and lacks expertise from outside Whitehall, says a critical report published today.

The Horizon Scanning Programme, set up in July last year, has still to give any public update about its work, and its meetings have taken place behind closed doors, the Commons Science and Technology Committee said. MPs warned of a "worrying lack of clarity" in the programme, and said without external experts the initiative would just be an "echo chamber for government views".

"Horizon scanning should be a way of opening the Government's eyes to a wide array of possible futures; these simply cannot be imagined by civil servants alone," the report says.

Andrew Miller, who chairs the committee, said: "If we are to try to imagine [future] possibilities, we need to incorporate a wide range of perspectives and open our hypotheses up to challenge."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in