Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Whitehall defends Paris embassy bill

Fran Abrams,Westminster Correspondent
Wednesday 17 May 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

17 May 2000

Britain's embassy in Paris spent almost £300,000 on entertainment in a single year, Robin Cook's most senior official acknowledged yesterday.

Sir John Kerr, the Permanent Secretary at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, defended the spending when he appeared before the Foreign Affairs Select Committee.

Diplomats working on the exclusive Rue du FaubourgSt Honor near the ChampsElysées spent £293,125 on food, drink and receptions in the 1998-99 financial year - higher than embassies in Washington, Tokyo and Moscow.

Sir John Kerr said he had "no concerns" about the spending. The Paris embassy was a valuable building used to host a large number of receptions that encourage trade, help the private sector and promote culture in Britain, he said.

He also said that, unlike other countries, France had a centralised system. That meant most important political and trade decisions were made in the capital rather than in centres across the country. "Paris is the place where we do the business," Sir John said.

The spending led to criticism earlier this month from Opposition MPs, who questioned whether it was necessary.

According to Foreign Office figures, the highest-spending embassies in 1988-99 after Paris were Tokyo, which spent £221,711, New York (£196,446), Brussels (£184,071), Washington DC (£112,645), Hong Kong (£103,573), Bonn (£101,809) and Geneva (£100,470).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in