White Paper on human rights law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A government White Paper on making the European Convention of Human Rights part of British law is to be published by the autumn, heralding new powers for judges to protect individuals from abuses by the state.
The move would make convention rights accessible in our courts at every level, Lord Irvine of Lairg, the Lord Chancellor, told a human rights conference in London, sparing citizens the cost and delay of going to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
In his first public speech since taking office, Lord Irvine told the conference, organised by University College London and the solicitors firm Bindman & Partners: "Incorporation will enhance the judge's powers to protect the individual against the abuse of power by the state."
A Bill is expected early in the next parliamentary session. Confirmation of the Government's manifesto commitment was widely welcomed by human rights experts yesterday. The Liberal Democrat peer and QC Lord Lester, whose own Human Rights Bill was passed by the House of Lords in 1995, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We're alone in the democratic world in having no code of values to guide law-makers and bureaucrats and judges in weighing public interest like free speech and personal privacy."
But the model of incorporation favoured by Lord Irvine drew criticism from some rights campaigners. The Lord Chancellor does not favour giving judges the right to "strike down" primary legislation which violates the convention.
John Wadham, director of the civil rights organisation Liberty, said: "It appears Lord Irvine believes that Parliament should reign supreme even when this would mean it is taking away our rights. Parliament is bound to make mistakes and the courts should be able to correct those mistakes."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments