Whistleblowers need greater protection, say MPs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Greater protection from police for civil service "whistleblowers" is demanded today by MPs in the wake of the arrest of Conservative frontbencher Damian Green.
Detectives faced anger last year when they detained both the Tory MP and Christopher Galley, the junior official who supplied him with Home Office papers. Four months later the Crown Prosecution Service abandoned action against either man. The Commons public administration select committee said police should only be called in when a "whistleblower" has broken the Official Secrets Act by passing material that could damage the national interest.
In a scathing analysis of the lack of policy debate in Whitehall, the committee said most civil service leakers acted out of frustration that important information is being covered up.
It said leaking for political reasons or financial gain was "deplorable" and "reprehensible" and that such as step had to be a "last resort" as it damaged trust within government. But it also acknowledged the problems civil servants faced in raising concerns that ministers could have misled MPs or the public. The committee suggested that officials should have a route whereby they can report such concerns to Parliament.
It said: "Relatively little consideration appears to have been given to support for whistleblowers once they have raised concerns in good faith. Committed civil servants are extremely unlikely to follow approved channels for whistleblowing if they fear that their careers could suffer as a result. They may see an anonymous disclosure to the press as safer."
The committee also warned that investigations of leaks were often hamstrung because they originated from ministers or their special advisers.
Tony Wright, the committee chairman, said it was essential civil servants knew what channels were available if they had concerns about information being released. He said: "A culture that encourages proper whistleblowing procedures is the best safeguard against leaking, and we believe the Civil Service has some way to go to achieve this."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments