Wealth gap between rich and poor has widened since 1997
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A report by the Government's own statisticians shows the difference in disposable income between the richest and poorest has grown by £91 a week since the mid-1990s.
The best off 10 per cent of people had a household income of £658 or more a week in 2002/2003, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) report.
That compares to just £164 a week or less for the poorest 10 per cent.
Since the mid-1990s disposable income grew by over a fifth for both groups. However, these increases resulted in a rise of £119 per week for the best off compared with a rise of £28 per week for the poorest.
The report said: "This shows that the absolute difference in the average weekly income has continued to widen."
The full report was published six months ago. But the ONS released a new summary yesterday. The Tories seized on the figures.
Shadow work and pensions secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind said: "This report shows exactly why we need a new approach to welfare reform. There is mounting evidence that voluntary enterprises and charities are much better at helping unemployed people into lasting jobs, at less cost to the taxpayer, than existing government programmes.
"Labour's agenda on poverty has been, at best, only partially successful. Their commitment to eradicating poverty is undoubtedly genuine, but the reality is that their rhetoric has exceeded their achievements."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments