Watchdog denounces the Home Office
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A devastating indictment of the running of the Home Office is made in a report by Commons spending watchdogs published today.
Although John Reid announced an action plan to remedy his department's failings on Wednesday, the all-party Public Accounts Committee suggests that its deep-seated problems will not be easily put right.
Edward Leigh, the committee's Tory chairman, said: "The significance of these failures can hardly be overstated. Together they constitute a severe indictment of the way in which the Home Office has been run."
In their report, the MPs say the Home Office "does not have a grip" on the issue of more than 1,000 foreign prisoners who were released without being considered for deportation.
The committee calls for a single, central electronic database covering both the Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND) and Prison Service.
The MPs are critical of the department's financial management, saying its new finance system "lost even the tenuous grip on its finances which previous outmoded systems had provided".
The Home Office failed to reconcile its in-house records with its bank statements and wrote off a £3m difference between them as "administration costs".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments