US trade deal poses greatest threat to food safety since mad cow disease, Britons warned
Which? raises alarm after Boris Johnson dumped promised ban on chlorinated chicken and hormone-fed beef, to strike quickfire agreement with Donald Trump
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
A US trade deal poses the greatest risk to food safety since mad cow disease 20 years ago, shoppers are being warned, after Boris Johnson’s U-turn on banning low-quality meat.
The consumer group Which? has raised the alarm after the government dumped its promise to outlaw chlorinated chicken and hormone-fed beef, in search of a quickfire agreement with Donald Trump.
In a letter to the trade secretary, Liz Truss, the organisation says the UK has – since the BSE crisis of the 1990s – “led a food safety revolution” to make it a world leader in protecting the public.
But it warns: “This could all be at risk depending on the approach that the government takes when it begins a second round of trade talks with the US on Monday.
“Which? recognises the benefits of trade and the benefits that could come from a UK-US trade deal – but this cannot be at the expense of our food standards and consumer confidence in what we eat.”
No less than 72 per cent of the British public does not want chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-fed beef to be allowed on sale in the UK, its survey had found.
The protest comes after Downing Street revealed a previous pledge to maintain the ban on those US products had been dropped, as talks on a trade deal with Washington ramp up.
Instead, ministers are pushing a “dual-tariff” regime, which would impose higher levies on good that fail to comply with UK animal welfare standards, arguing that would make US exports uneconomical.
But Which? said it feared a “two-tier system” which would see cheap, lower-quality food made available in schools and NHS canteens for example.
“UK consumers have a legitimate fear that two decades of progress on food safety and animal welfare could be traded away in just two weeks of negotiations with the US,” warned Sue Davies, its head of consumer protection.
The criticism reflects evidence that washing chicken in chlorine – as well as being an animal welfare issue – poses food safety risks because it does not remove bacteria and masks other dangerous practices.
Critics have highlighted the risk of food poisoning from cross-contamination with the deadly bacteria salmonella and campylobacter, because of poor standards when the UK was an EU member.
That ban will be transferred to UK law at the end of the Brexit transition period in December, but Ms Truss has made clear it will be up to MPs whether to then lift it.
The government enjoyed an 80-strong majority and has refused to impose the same food safety standards in the Agriculture Bill currently going through parliament – despite a Tory revolt.
In her letter, Ms Davies wrote: “This weaker approach risks both destroying the public’s trust in trade deals and leaving our future national approach to food entirely compromised.
“We therefore urge you to listen to the British public who value the UK's high food standards and ensure that they are upheld in the negotiations.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments