‘Unconscionable’ universal credit could plunge half a million households into poverty, warns top UN official
Ministers under pressure to reverse decision to end £20-a-week uplift introduced during pandemic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The decision to cut universal credit by £20 a week is “unconscionable” and could plunge hundreds of thousands of households into poverty, a top United Nations official has warned.
Ministers have come under continued pressure to reverse the decision to end the £20-a-week uplift introduced to support families during the Covid-19 pandemic, with recipients expected to lose out on £1,040 annually if the cut goes ahead.
Olivier De Schutter, the UN’s special rapporteur on extreme poverty, has warned the move breaches international human rights law and could cause half a million low-income households, including 200,000 children, to fall below the poverty line.
In a letter to the UK government, he urged ministers to reconsider the proposed cut “since it is prima facie doubtful whether the removal of the £20 uplift conforms to international human rights law and standards”.
Mr De Schutter told the Guardian it was “unconscionable at this point in time to remove this benefit”.
Boris Johnson refuses to explain how Universal Credit claimants can make up lost £20-a-week
Universal credit isn’t fit for purpose – a further £20 cut will be devastating for survivors of domestic abuse
Labour challenges Tory MPs to ‘do the right thing’ and oppose Universal Credit cut
Boris Johnson will show ‘absence of basic humanity’ if he cuts Universal Credit, Nicola Sturgeon says
Work and Pensions Secretary accused of getting figures wrong on Universal Credit
He also warned £20 a week “makes a huge difference and could be the difference between falling into extreme poverty or remaining just above that poverty line” for many of those receiving universal credit.
Labour urged Conservative MPs who oppose the welfare cut to “do the right thing” and back a vote calling for the government to scrap the plans on Wednesday.
MPs supported the motion by 253 votes to zero, but it is non-binding and does not force the government to act.
Boris Johnson refused to explain how claimants can make up the lost £20 a week, after cabinet minister Therese Coffey on Monday got her sums wrong and claimed recipients would only need to work an extra two hours a week.
The prime minister declined to say whether the true figure was higher or lower after experts concluded the answer was up to nine hours.
Ministers plan to begin phasing out the uplift from the end of September, based on individual claimants’ payment dates.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments