Unions warn their support is vital for public-sector reform
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Public-sector unions threatened to scupper plans to extend the private sector's role in running public services yesterday after talks with Tony Blair failed to resolve their rift with the Government.
As Downing Street warned that the unions would not have a veto over Mr Blair's reforms of the public sector, union leaders warned bluntly that the changes could not work if their members withheld their co-operation.
Dave Prentis, general secretary of Unison, the biggest public-service union, said: "My union has 1.25 million members providing services to the public. If the Government is to achieve its objectives, it needs the support and goodwill of our members to actually do that. It's not a threat – it's a fact of life."
He added: "I don't believe that this Government will want to spend the next two years in conflict with the trade unions about the role of the private company when the clear agenda is that we have got to improve public services."
A spokesman for the GMB general union said: "Our members do have a veto over how the reforms are implemented.
"If the Government wants to turn round public services in four years, it will have to do it with the support of public-sector workers rather than go to war on them."
Union leaders failed to win any substantial concessions from Mr Blair when they had dinner at Downing Street on Wednesday night. "The only thing we agreed on was not to disclose the menu," one union leader said yesterday.
The Labour leadership may provoke a further dispute with the unions by seeking to limit debate on public-private partnerships at the party's annual conference in October. Party officials plan to rule that motions tabled by the unions critical of the Government's plans cannot be discussed because the issue will be considered by a Labour policy commission to be set up next month.
Charles Clarke, the Labour Party chairman who was at Wednesday's meeting, insisted the election victory had given the Government an "absolute mandate" to deliver its promised reforms.
Mr Blair's spokesman said: "We can't achieve the changes we want to see without their [public-sector workers'] support. But in the end, nobody has a veto over that process."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments