Union-link review body offers no blueprint
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LABOUR'S review group on union links yesterday abandoned an attempt to draw up a blueprint for reforming the relationship.
The decision effectively increases the chance that John Smith's preferred option of one member one vote will be introduced for the election of the leadership and selection of MPs.
At the heart of the conflict is the insistence of most of the big unions that they should retain voting power.
The committee decided that there would be no clear recommendation on the issue to the Labour executive, which in turn is expected to delay a decision until after the union conference season which ends next summer. It is hoped that a final verdict will be delivered by the party conference next October.
Originally, the committee was to reach a conclusion in time for the party's national executive committee meeting on 16 December. A final paper, to rehearse the options rather than make recommendations will not be finalised until the NEC meeting in January or possibly February.
Postponement came after disquiet among the party leadership over a paper prepared by the Labour secratariat which seemed to summarise review group discussions as moving towards the concept of 'registered supporters' of the party. That meant that, for both leadership elections and selection of MPs, political levy payers could register as backers of the party and participate in an electoral college.
Supporters of one member one vote - which Mr Smith has said must be 'the clear principle' on which major decisions are taken - believe it now stands a far better chance of being adopted.
Many smaller unions, they believe, would find the registered voter system too complex and expensive to operate, and will thus oppose it, while they expect the constituencies - who will have 30 per cent of the votes at next year's conference - to do the same.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments