Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK joins plan to ease sanctions on Zimbabwe

Hain blasts Government for relaxing asset freeze as new evidence of a blood diamond scandal emerges

Andrew Grice
Wednesday 18 July 2012 11:04 BST
Comments
Britain will back a European plan to ease sanctions on Zimbabwe – but not on its President, Robert Mugabe
Britain will back a European plan to ease sanctions on Zimbabwe – but not on its President, Robert Mugabe (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain will support European Union moves to relax sanctions against Zimbabwe in an attempt to encourage free and fair elections in the country.

The controversial move came as the UK Government was urged to tighten sanctions against companies accused of using profits from "blood diamonds" to prop up the regime of Robert Mugabe.

Alistair Burt, a Foreign Office minister, told MPs yesterday that Britain would propose that, if a peaceful and credible referendum on reforms is held ahead of "free and fair" elections due next year, the EU should suspend its ban on direct development aid, its asset freeze and its travel ban on all but a small core of people around Mr Mugabe. He said they could be reimposed if progress stalled.

"For the avoidance of doubt, there is no prospect of this being applied to President Mugabe himself and any suspension relating to him," Mr Burt said. EU foreign ministers will discuss the issue on Monday.

Mr Burt was replying to a Commons debate staged by Peter Hain, the former Labour Cabinet minister, who said it was strange to be relaxing sanctions when there is evidence of a new scandal over "blood diamonds".

Mr Hain said: "Let us be clear: Zimbabwean military-controlled blood diamonds are now sold within the EU and almost certainly within the UK, appearing on wedding rings. It is time for jewellery companies to stop hiding behind the façade of the Kimberley Process [to stop diamonds being used to finance military activity] and take responsibility for their own supply chains."

The former Foreign Office minister and anti-apartheid campaigner called for companies Sam Pa, Anjin and Sino Zimbabwe Development to be added to the sanctions list to prevent Mr Mugabe's Zanu-PF party from funding a fresh wave of terror ahead of the planned elections. He said it was "bizarre" that Anjin was not on the list even though there is a more compelling case for its inclusion than for other mining firms covered by their association with the Zimbabwe Minerals Development Corporation.

Speaking with the protection of parliamentary privilege, Mr Hain claimed all three companies had clear links with the Mugabe-run parts of the Zimbabwe government and the secret police. Global Witness, the human-rights charity, has alleged that money from diamond mines is funding a "parallel government" and police force.

Mr Burt said that the Government was willing to back some sanction suspensions to encourage reforms but would encourage additions to sanction lists if evidence was presented. He said he could not name any possible additions.

"The militarisation of diamond finance is an issue that directly impacts the prospects of free and fair elections and are risks of which we are acutely aware," he said. "We are looking very carefully at the evidence and we will share it with partners."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in