Trade Union Bill: Sajid Javid drops social media measures as part of Government climb down
The scrapped measures would have required those taking part in industrial action to tell police how they palnned to use social media
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Business secretary Sajid Javid appears to have made a partial climb down on part of the Government’s controversial Trade Union Bill.
Measures that would have required all of those taking part in industrial action tell police how they planned to use social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been dropped by the Department for Business and Skills.
The proposal had drawn criticism from human rights organisations such as Liberty and Amnesty International, while it was labelled “illiberal, unfair and unnecessary” by TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady.
“The Government has no intention of making every individual on the picket line give their names to the authorities,” wrote skills minister Nick Boles in the Government response to the consultation on the Bill.
“Nor do we want to stop strikers using social media or require them to seek police approval for Tweets before they are posted,” he added. “There is also nothing in the Bill that facilitates the illegal practice of blacklisting.”
Unions welcomed the news but said the Bill was still a threat to civil liberties.
“The Government is clearly beginning to feel the pressure to amend this draconian and unnecessary Bill,” said Ms O’Grady, adding that it was “a ridiculous plan.”
“Today’s announcement doesn’t change the fact that this Bill is a huge threat to civil liberties,” she added. “Picket supervisors will still have to give their name and contact details to the police, and unions still face court injunctions and possible damages if an organiser forgets to wear an armband.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments