Tory MP says living on £82,000 salary is ‘really grim’
Financial situation ‘desperately difficult’ for younger MPs, Father of the House suggests
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Conservative MP Sir Peter Bottomley said that some MPs are finding it “really grim” to live on a salary of £82,000.
The Worthing West MP said that the annual salary, which does not include expenses and perks, should be higher.
The median salary in the UK is just over £31,000, according to the Office for National Statistics.
In an interview with the New Statesman, Sir Peter insisted that MPs should get paid as much as GP – about £100,000 on average in England.
An increase of £18,000 a year to MPs’ salaries would represent a pay rise of almost 22 per cent. The government this year offered NHS staff a rise of 3 per cent.
Sir Peter said: “I take the view that being an MP is the greatest honour you could have, but a general practitioner in politics ought to be paid roughly the same as a general practitioner in medicine.
“Doctors are paid far too little nowadays. But if they would get roughly £100,000 a year, the equivalent for an MP to get the same standard of living would be £110-£115,000 a year.
“It’s never the right time, but if your MP isn’t worth the money, it's better to change the MP than to change the money.”
While Sir Peter said he did not struggle financially, he believed the situation was “desperately difficult” for newer MPs.
He said: “I don’t know how they manage. It’s really grim.”
His comments came as ministers pressed ahead with a cut Universal Credit that charities have warned will plunge thousands of people into poverty.
Sir Peter said he believed the £20 benefit uplift – paid out to claimants during the Covid pandemic – should have been “tapered” off rather than completely removed from 6 October.
The MP, aged 77, is Father of the House as he is the longest-serving current member of the Commons.
Before he was an MP and serving in Margaret Thatcher’s government, he drove a lorry after graduating from University of Cambridge. He joined the Transport and General Workers Union and got into local politics.
Universal Credit: What does the government’s social security cut mean for families?
Gary Neville says it is ‘brutal’ to reduce Universal Credit as £20-a-week uplift comes to end
Tory benefits minister sings about ‘having time of my life’ hour after universal credit cut comes into force
‘Inappropriate’ to stop £20 cut to Universal Credit, says Boris Johnson
Universal Credit cut will be ‘devastating’ for the most vulnerable, says charity
He recalled considering stepping down from Parliament during the interview in 1982 because of financial strains.
His wife Virginia, with whom he had dependent children at the time, had given up paid work to run as a candidate on the Isle of Wight. She was elected to a different constituency in 1984 before she became a life peer in 2005.
Sir Peter said: “MPs’ pay was low, and I wasn’t going to go either broke or crooked to keep going.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments