Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tory MP criticises Jeremy Hunt for ‘misquoting evidence’ during junior doctors' row

'Ministers are undermining their case and inflaming tensions by misquoting evidence'

Alexandra Sims
Sunday 03 April 2016 20:41 BST
Comments
Junior Doctors protest outside the Department of Health
Junior Doctors protest outside the Department of Health (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Conservative MP has criticised Jeremy Hunt for “misquoting evidence” while arguing for the imposition of a new junior doctor’s contract.

Dr Sarah Wollaston, the chair of the Commons' Health Select Committee, said the health secretary used an "entirely unreasonable" strategy to garner support for an “unachievable” seven-day NHS.

Writing in the Guardian, Ms Wollaston said, “Ministers are undermining their case and inflaming tensions by misquoting evidence”, adding Mr Hunt risks an “exodus” of young medics from the NHS.

Her claim follows repeated accusations that Mr Hunt misrepresented research into death rates among patients admitted over the weekend.

Dr Sarah Wollaston, Conservative Member of Parliament for the constituency of Totnes and chairs the Commons Health Committee
Dr Sarah Wollaston, Conservative Member of Parliament for the constituency of Totnes and chairs the Commons Health Committee (Facebook)

The author of a study into patient deaths cited by the health secretary, and used as part of his justification for imposing the new contract on junior doctors, said his use of figures was “inaccurate”, after Mr Hunt claimed in July around 6,000 patients a year died because of the level of NHS staffing at weekends.

At PMQs in February, Jeremy Corbyn asked David Cameron whether he agreed Mr Hunt had been misleading when he cited the figure.

Ms Wollaston, who was a GP for 25 years before becoming an MP in 2010, also debunked Mr Hunt’s claim that more doctors were needed at weekends to improve death rates among patients.

Instead, she claims, the Government should focus on ensuring more senior directors and nurses are available at weekends and better access to diagnostic services is provided.

“It is perfectly reasonable for the government to try and tackle the higher mortality at 30 days [after admission] for those admitted to hospital at weekends but entirely unreasonable to blunder on asserting that the new contract is the answer,” she said.

In her addition to her attacks on Mr Hunt, Ms Wollaston, whose daughter is a junior doctor, also criticised the British Medical Association for not accepting the government’s final offer in February to resolve the dispute.

She also described junior doctor’s plans for a full strike on 26 and 27 April, during which doctors will not provide emergency surgery for the first time, as “disastrous”.

The BMA, told the Guardian, Ms Wollaston's claims "show a complete disregard for the views of junior doctors".

The government announced plans to unilaterally impose the new contract on all junior doctors in England in February, after talks with the doctors' union, the British Medical Association, broke down.

The main sticking point of the new contract is changes to pay for working Saturdays and unsociable hours.

Recent criticisms of Mr Hunt’s imposed contract focus upon an equality analysis which appears to condone the new contract having an “indirect adverse impact on women”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in