Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tories promise pollution tax

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Tory government would introduce a tax on water pollution, John Gummer, the Secretary of State for the Environment, announced yesterday. The money raised would be used to cut other taxes and fund local wildlife conservation projects.

He launched the Conservatives' special green manifesto at the party headquarters yesterday. But most journalists present wanted to know why the Tory leadership was not demanding the resignation of MP Ian Hamilton.

The tax would be based on the quantity and toxicity of pollution and could raise several hundred million pounds a year. It would apply to the privatised water companies which discharge treated effluent from their sewage works.

Yet even though this would raise their costs, the Conservatives promise that water charges will fall after the next price review by industry regulator Ofwat.

Companies currently need a licence to discharge pollutants into rivers and the sea. The cost of this varies according to the quantity and type of pollution, but the charge is only intended to cover costs. The new tax would go beyond this.

Charles Secrett, director of Friends of the Earth, said: ``We're desperately disappointed by ... this manifesto. It's a bit of green but mostly grey.''

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in