Top UK aid contractor pressured recipients to give positive reviews, Government report finds
'Damning report' throws spotlight on activities of aid programme contractor Adam Smith International
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of Britain's leading aid contractors pressured beneficiaries to write favourable testimonies while it was under investigation, a Government report has found, amid growing scrutiny over UK aid spending.
Britain last year launched an inquiry into the use of contractors in its overseas humanitarian programmes after facing criticism for paying rising amounts to for-profit private companies to deliver aid.
Adam Smith International, which is contracted by the Department for International Development (DfID) to run aid programmes, threatened to withdraw funds from some recipients unless they wrote beneficial evidence for the inquiry, the parliamentary committee report found.
DfID has come under increasing scrutiny over how it spends its budget, which rose by 4 per cent to £12bn last year, as the Government grapples with public debt at its highest level in almost 50 years.
"This is a damning report which reflects badly on the activities of a leading UK aid contractor," said International Development Committee chair Stephen Twigg in a statement.
Mr Twigg said the group's attempts to conceal their involvement in obtaining favourable testimonials about their work were “entirely inappropriate and show a serious lack of judgement”.
The report said the company's director Peter Young wrote in an email to staff: “Frankly, this is a time for beneficiaries to step up and be helpful. They are getting free, high quality advice and should be prepared to chip in.”
Adam Smith International did not respond to several requests for comment.
The ongoing inquiry will examine whether contractors provide value for money and whether salaries, profits and dividends in the sector are appropriate.
Britain lost £3.2m through fraud in its overseas aid programmes in 2015-16, with the most serious cases in Afghanistan, Somalia, Syria and the Democratic Republic of Congo, a parliamentary watchdog said on Thursday.
The UK Government has stuck to a pledge to spend 0.7 per cent of its national income on foreign aid, although some politicians say the budget would be better spent at home.
Reuters
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments