Blair and Hague unite in push for new ‘digital IDs’
Former rivals Sir Tony Blair and Lord Hague said ‘a new sense of national purpose across political dividing lines is needed’.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Every citizen should be issued with a “digital ID” as part of a “fundamental reshaping of the state around technology”, Sir Tony Blair and Lord Hague have urged.
The former political rivals said the challenge of adapting to the new technological revolution meant putting party differences to one side.
Their plan would involve a new ID incorporating details such as a passport, driving licence, tax records, qualifications and right to work status which could be stored on a mobile phone.
We both believe the challenge is so urgent, the danger of falling behind so great and the opportunities so exciting that a new sense of national purpose across political dividing lines is needed
In a joint article for The Times they said: “Politics must change radically because the world is changing radically.
“We are living through a 21st-century technology revolution as huge in its implications as the 19th-century Industrial Revolution.”
They warned that politicians were in danger of conducting a “20th century fight at the margins of tax and spending policy” rather than grappling with the fundamental shifts required in the new era.
“We both believe the challenge is so urgent, the danger of falling behind so great and the opportunities so exciting that a new sense of national purpose across political dividing lines is needed,” the former Labour and Tory leaders said.
The pair suggested a shake-up of Whitehall “including digital ID for every citizen, a national health infrastructure that uses data to improve care and keep costs down, and sovereign AI systems backed by supercomputing capabilities”.
The Times reported that the pair’s plan, published in a report with more than 40 recommendations, included:
– Limiting the Treasury’s power to manage science and technology investment.
– Appointing “executive ministers” from outside Parliament to rewire Whitehall’s approach to science and technology.
– Using AI to help teachers in schools and provide personalised support to pupils at home.
– Offering tax breaks to stimulate pension fund investment in UK start-ups.
People already live their lives digitally. The question is whether government and politics can catch up with that reality
On BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Sir Tony – who pushed to introduce ID cards as prime minister – said technology would overcome many people’s concerns about online dangers.
“If you look at the biometric technology that allows you to do digital ID today, it can overcome many of these problems,” he said.
“The world is moving in that direction, countries as small as Estonia and as large as India are moving in that direction or have moved in that direction.”
He added: “Here’s our problem: We’re spending a lot, we’re heavily taxed, and the outcomes are poor.
“So the question is what changes that situation? So if you take, for example, the ambition we have on climate, there is no way we can meet that ambition without changing planning. There’s literally no way we can do it.
“And a lot of these things, they’re not airy-fairy, they’re actually about people’s lives. People already live their lives digitally. The question is whether government and politics can catch up with that reality.”