'Tinderbox' warning for Commons
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MPs WERE alarmed last night after a report that it could cost pounds 9m to prevent their Victorian building from acting like a tinderbox, writes Colin Brown.
House of Commons officials are planning to spend an estimated pounds 500,000 to improve fire-safety procedures, including emergency lighting for fire escapes.
But members of the cross-party Commons Public Accounts Committee were disturbed to hear that the work was yet to be completed, although it was recommended in a report 14 years ago which warned the Commons was a 'fire trap' and a 'tinderbox'. The committee heard that it could cost pounds 1.3m a year until the end of the century to tackle the fire hazards.
The consultants' fire-safety report on the Commons is being studied by another committee of MPs responsible for the House.
The Public Accounts Committee was also urged by the Chief Fire Officers' Association to review the immunity of Crown buildings from fire safety laws.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments