Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The 120-year-old dilemma that continues to haunt Westminster

 

Seb McCarthy,Oliver Wright
Tuesday 09 July 2013 21:59 BST
Comments
William Gladstone in 1861
William Gladstone in 1861 (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

It is a question that is over 120 years old but has yet to be solved. William Gladstone was the first to raise the conundrum of whether elected representatives should be able to vote on issues which would have no effect on the lives of their constituents. In 1886, the four-times Prime Minister, talking about issues raised by Irish home rule, said: “If Ireland is to have domestic legislation for Irish affairs they cannot come here for English or Scottish affairs”.

The term the “West Lothian question” was coined in 1977 when the prospect of Scottish devolution was raised. Tam Dalyell brought attention to the fact that he was able to vote on issues that affect the English town of Blackburn, Lancashire, but not Blackburn, West Lothian, in his own constituency.

Since then the question has become even more relevant, with the creation of the Scottish Parliament and Welsh and Northern Ireland Assemblies which control large areas of policy. In May 2010 the Coalition decided to create a commission to resolve the problem. The Mackay Commission published its report in March this year, recommending that forthcoming legislation which would have an effect on England only, ought to have the backing of a majority of MPs that represent English constituencies. But it did not back the idea of giving an effective veto to English MPs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in