Teachers warn on schools spending
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A future Labour government must be prepared to break its promise of a two-year freeze on public spending and pump more money into education.
Speaking on the first day of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers conference in Cardiff, the union's general secretary, Peter Smith, said that by sticking to the spending pledge "like Araldite", Shadow Chancellor Gordon Brown would provoke cynicism among teachers and voters.
It was questionable whether the party would be able to tackle problems it had identified as needing attention, he said.
Mr Smith called on Labour to review spending on education within its first 100 days in power if it gained office on 1 May.
Increasing cash for schools should be its top education priority, since the sector had been squeezed "till the pips squeaked."
A recent Harris poll commissioned by ATL revealed 86 per cent of the public thought more money was top of the list if schools were to improve.
Mr Smith, who heads a moderate union of 150,000 teachers and lecturers, stepped back from condemning Mr Brown, but added: "If he really is saying that for two years he will apply the decision, with no moderation whatsoever, put into place by his predecessor Kenneth Clarke, then it will only be a matter of time before people ask, 'Time for a change? Where is the change in that?'"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments