Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour MPs to revolt against Corbyn’s controversial support for Tory tax cut benefiting top earners

Labour leader warned his backing is ‘unacceptable’ to many of his backbenchers – ahead of a vote late on Thursday

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 31 October 2018 19:23 GMT
Comments
Labour MP Lisa Nandy: 'Budget is huge giveaway to the highest earners'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour MPs are planning a major revolt against Jeremy Corbyn’s controversial support for a Conservative tax cut that will mainly benefit top earners.

The Labour leader has been warned that the move is “unacceptable” to many of his backbenchers ahead of a vote late on Thursday.

The leadership will order its MPs to abstain in the vote, but Lisa Nandy, a respected former shadow minister, said many of her colleagues viewed such a tax cut for the rich as “immoral”.

Yvette Cooper, David Lammy and Alison McGovern are among other Labour MPs who have criticised the move – a hike in the threshold before the 40p income tax rate kicks in at £50,000.

John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor, has said he will not oppose the change because Labour is “not going to take money out of people's pockets”.

He argues Labour will only ask the top 5 per cent of earners to pay more, under planned increases in income tax rates that would kick in at £80,000.

But Ms Nandy said: “It’s completely right for Labour to say the richest 5 per cent should pay more.

“However, I believe we have to roar loudly on behalf of 4.1 million children in poverty in this country – and vote against the Tory tax cuts that according to the Resolution Foundation overwhelmingly benefit the rich.”

The clash sets up the extraordinary prospect of Labour MPs rebelling against Mr Corbyn and Mr McDonnell for failing to be radical enough on tax and spend.

It follows Philip Hammond’s decision to bring forward the threshold changes, to next April, including an increase in the tax-free allowance to £12,500.

They will cost the Treasury almost £2.8bn which, the Foundation found, would overwhelmingly benefit wealthier households, with almost half the giveaway going to the top 10 per cent of earners.

Ms Nandy revealed the revolt to Sky News, saying there were “a number of people who feel that this is just too unacceptable”.

“In the end, we need to go back to our constituencies, sit in our surgeries and look people in the eye and explain why we’ve done what we did,” she said.

Earlier, Ms Cooper, a former Labour leadership contender, said: “This is wrong. I cannot support it.”

Ms McGovern, the chair of the Progress group, formerly associated with Tony Blair, said: “We can’t support spending more on tax cuts for quite wealthy people than on dealing with the universal credit mess.”

And Mr Lammy said: “These tax cuts leave a bitter taste in my mouth because they help high earners in the City far more than my constituents in Tottenham, some of whom this winter will be facing the choice between eating and heating.”

Mr McDonnell has refused to back down, saying. “We’re not going to take funding away from people.

“Some of these are middle earners, headteachers and people like that, who’ve had a rough time of it, as well as everyone else.”

The stance is being seen as evidence of the shadow chancellor’s increasing pragmatism, as he seeks to put Labour on course for an election victory.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in