'Superior herb' was given royal approval
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As early as 2737BC the Chinese Emperor Sheng Nun described cannabis as a superior herb, and for centuries it was embraced unreservedly. The Roman emperor Nero's surgeon praised it for its medicinal efficacy. In 1794 George Washington urged his gardener to "sow it everywhere". Queen Victoria took it for her period pains. In 1901 a Royal Commission concluded that cannabis was relatively harmless and not worth banning.
As early as 2737BC the Chinese Emperor Sheng Nun described cannabis as a superior herb, and for centuries it was embraced unreservedly. The Roman emperor Nero's surgeon praised it for its medicinal efficacy. In 1794 George Washington urged his gardener to "sow it everywhere". Queen Victoria took it for her period pains. In 1901 a Royal Commission concluded that cannabis was relatively harmless and not worth banning.
An Irish doctor working in Calcutta in the 1930s was the first Westerner to recognise the drug's ability to alleviate various conditions, including epilepsy and rheumatism.
The recreational use of cannabis led to its prohibition in the 1928 Dangerous Drugs Act, and the Sixties were marked by high-profile protests against the law. In 1967, a full-page advertisement in The Times - signatories included the Beatles and the novelist Graham Greene - called the law immoral and unworkable. There were also "smoke-ins" in Hyde Park. However, in 1968, the Labour government rejected the investigative committee's conclusion that "consumption of cannabis in moderation has no harmful effects".
Pressure for legal change gathered pace again in the 1990s. In 1997, the Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics (ACT) launched a national advertising campaign urging legalisation for medical uses. The following year, thousands marched on Trafalgar Square to back The Independent on Sunday's campaign for decriminalisation.
Tony Blair has supported the use of cannabis for medicinal purposes. However, his government has this year rejected recommendations from the Police Foundation that certain drugs should be reclassified and penalties reduced.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments