Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Straw condemns monarchy as deeply decadent

Anthony Bevins
Friday 05 February 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE MONARCHY was a 'deeply decadent' system financed by the taxpayer, Jack Straw, Labour's environment spokesman, said in an interview for today's issue of Tribune.

But the return of Mr Straw to the controversy over the Royal Family was accompanied by a statement that will provoke even more surprise inside his own party: an official acceptance that council tax and compulsory competitive tendering would be maintained by a Labour government.

Mr Straw caused a stir on Labour's front bench last month when he likened royalty to a soap opera with no serious future and called for a more informal Scandinavian-style monarchy.

He told Tribune he had reached that conclusion after reading Andrew Morton's book Diana: Her True Story, which he called 'a remarkably subversive document that exposes a deeply decadent and detached system for which we're all paying'.

He added: 'It hadn't occurred to me before that the royals were at the apex of a separate society of extremely rich people.'

Mr Straw said last night that he had been surprised by the number of Tory MPs who had told him, privately, that they agreed with his earlier remarks.

It was also significant, he added, that the Conservatives had made no attempt to exploit his views in Prime Minister's Question Time; suggesting that they did not feel there was any political mileage in the issue for them.

As for Labour's attitude to the council tax and compulsory competitive tendering (CCT), Mr Straw said they would both be retained by a Labour government.

'The underlying principle of council tax is OK - it's a property tax. But some of its practice is bad. We'll be working out how it can be changed so that it becomes much more like what we wanted in the fair rates system.'

Last year's Labour manifesto promised to replace the poll tax with an updated version of the rating system, which was abolished by the Tories. It rejected the council tax, which takes effect from April, as 'a property poll tax'.

The manifesto also said: 'Compulsory competitive tendering (CCT) will be abolished, but the quality commission will have the power, where services have broken down, to insist that they are put out to tender, with contractors required to meet conditions such as quality thresholds and fair employment.'

But Mr Straw told Tribune that CCT had delivered 'sensible' divisions between contractors and councils, and clear definitions of the services to be delivered. 'But while I have seen the case for CCT for the provision of basic services such as refuse collection, I'm very sceptical about using it for core management functions.'

Mr Straw is working on a revision of Clause 4 of his party's constitution, which deals with public ownership. That review did not make him a traitor, he said.

He passionately believed in public ownership, but he added: 'We have to develop a much deeper analysis of the defects of free markets. What I want to do is to stimulate a debate about ideology, and Clause 4 is at the heart of the argument about what the party stands for.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in