Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Some Labour MPs will not be around to enjoy a third term

John Curtice
Tuesday 11 January 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour MPs in marginal seats are, it seems, on the horns of a dilemma. On the one hand they cannot afford for Gordon Brown to rock the boat. Yet on the other hand their chances of actually holding their seats would be much better if Mr Brown were to take over from Mr Blair.

Labour currently has a six-point lead over the Conservatives in our NOP poll, enough to ensure that Mr Blair would be re-elected for a third term with a substantial majority. But the lead is three points down on our previous poll in November. And equally importantly, it is three points less than at the 2001 election. Some Labour MPs in marginal seats look as though they will not be around to enjoy the third term.

Yet according to our poll, they would be returned if Mr Blair had in fact fulfilled his alleged promise to hand the leadership over to Mr Brown last autumn. Fifty per cent say they would vote Labour if Mr Brown were to become leader, enough to give the party a lead of more than 20 points over the Conservatives. The prospect of Mr Brown becoming leader appears to be particularly attractive to those currently minded to vote Liberal Democrat, one in five of whom say they would switch to Labour if Mr Brown were leader. Doubtless, a significant proportion of these are former Labour voters who are disenchanted with the current Blairite regime.

Hitherto, most polls have suggested that a change of Labour leader would have at most a small impact on Labour's fortunes. But that is apparently no longer so. Even if we were to treat our respondents' reactions with some scepticism and suggest that not all would actually change their mind in the event of Mr Brown becoming leader, our findings certainly indicate that Mr Brown has a positive image among a crucial section of the electorate - an image that if effectively deployed could help to save the careers of some Labour MPs in marginal seats.

In any event, our findings seem unlikely to help ease the tensions between the Blair and the Brown camps. The sense of grievance evidently felt by the latter can only be stoked by the thought that their man could now be the more attractive electorally. But Labour's lead is neither so large nor so secure that it can afford continuing tension at the top.

John Curtice is professor of politics at Strathclyde University.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in