Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Snooper's charter: Theresa May to present revised Investigatory Powers Bill with tougher privacy protections

Concessions unlikely to meet objections of civil liberties groups or to reassure critics who say Bill is being rushed

Nigel Morris
Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 01 March 2016 01:11 GMT
Comments
The Home Office ruled against Theresa May, and in favour of the men remaining in the UK
The Home Office ruled against Theresa May, and in favour of the men remaining in the UK (EPA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Theresa May has bowed to pressure from MPs and toughened up privacy protections in new surveillance laws published today with a view to getting them in place by the end of the year.

A draft version of the Investigatory Powers Bill – the so-called “snooper’s charter” – faced stinging criticism in three parliamentary reports in January.

Sources said the Home Secretary had revised key sections of the Bill in response, with the aim of heading off objections that the legislation handed too much power to the security services to eavesdrop and bug communications.

However, the concessions are unlikely to meet the objections of civil liberties groups or to reassure parliamentary critics who say the legislation is being rushed through parliament.

The Bill will now:

  • Require security agencies to reapply for equipment interference warrants – the power to hack computers and telephones – every three rather than five days.
  • Guarantee that telecoms companies will only be asked to remove encryption they have fitted on devices –  and only where it is “practicable”.
  • Prevent security agencies from asking foreign countries to spy on their behalf unless they have a warrant approved by a Cabinet minister.
  • Force the security services and police to obtain a senior judge’s permission before accessing communications data to identify a journalist’s source.
  • Set out “strict codes of practice” detailing why the powers in the Bill will be used and why they are needed.

A source said: “We have considered the committees’ reports carefully and the Bill we are bringing forward today reflects the majority of their recommendations. We have strengthened safeguards, enhanced privacy protections and bolstered oversight arrangements.

“Terrorists and criminals are operating online and we need to ensure the police and security services can keep pace with the modern world and continue to protect the British public from the many serious threats we face.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in