Sketch: Margaret Hodge gets her teeth into former HSBC executives in Public Accounts Committee hearing
'I really do think you should think about resigning and if not, I think the government should sack you,' Hodge tells BBC chair
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Having seen captains of industry reduced to gibbering imbecility by Margaret Hodge, Rona Fairhead must have been apprehensive about appearing before the Public Accounts Committee today. But this was a train wreck beyond her worst expectations.
In top “Off-with-her-head” form, Hodge told the BBC chair, who was on HSBC’s audit committee when the clients of the Bank’s Swiss subsidiary were dodging tax “on an industrial scale”: “Having watched your performance this afternoon… either you knew, (“I categorically deny that,” interjected Ms Fairhead) “Or you didn’t know. And in that case you are either incredibly naive or totally incompetent. I don’t think… your performance here… gives me the confidence that you should be the guardian of the BBC licence fee payers’ money… I really do think you should think about resigning and if not, I think the government should sack you.”
The problem for Ms Fairhead and the former HSBC global private banking head (unspoken motto: “Switzerland was a faraway country of which I knew nothing”) Chris Meares, who was unsighted on what was going on “because no one flagged it up”, was that they never seemed to ask the right questions about just how the Swiss subsidiary was contributing a third of private banking’s escalating profits. Or why 14,000 clients had “hold mail” accounts which stipulated that they never got anything in writing.
Sadly for Meares, HSBC CEO Stuart Gulliver – who has subsequently reduced such accounts to 12 – admitted freely that “hold mail” was standard for tax evaders, because the “ruddy evasive” (copyright M Hodge) Meares had given more ingenious explanations, including fear of kidnapping and having “multiple homes.”
The Meares/Fairhead defence was that the “policy” was fine. And it was up to relevant executives to bring any malpractice to light. As in “look my chaps are running a fabulous racket in Switzerland. Illegal, I know, but damned profitable.” One “policy” seemed to be – contrary to the top brass being paid fabulous salaries for the responsibility – that the further you were away from what Ms Fairhead called the “front line” the less you could be expected to know.
But then we were, as Labour’s Anne McGuire said, in a “banking bubble”. Mr Gulliver was asked about reports that people had been able to take £5m out in cash without questions being asked, presumably before he curbed such amounts to £250,000. Well. he said, that wasn’t “automatically” to evade tax. For the Middle East super-rich that could be “normal”. True. It might be just to buy a dozen perfectly innocent ground-to-air missiles.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments