Sir David Omand backs coalition's plans for 'secret courts'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of Britain's most senior intelligence figures has joined the Government's campaign to force through controversial reforms that critics claim will allow cases to be decided in a new generation of "secret courts".
Sir David Omand, the former Intelligence & Security Co-ordinator, has spoken out in favour of the Justice and Security Bill as ministers prepare to bring it back before MPs this week.
A chorus of critics, including hundreds of lawyers and MPs from all parties, have condemned the proposed legislation, particularly plans for "closed material procedures" (CMPs), where cases would be conducted entirely in private, in civil hearings.
But in an article for The Independent on Sunday, Sir David says CMPs would be "a huge improvement". He adds: "The principle of open justice is an important one. But so is accountability. The real prize in the Bill is to increase the ability of the courts to get to the bottom of serious allegations made against the Security and Intelligence Agencies... we can have confidence that the truth will out."
But the Tory MP Andrew Tyrie, a veteran opponent of the Bill, insisted that the proposed changes would make it harder to get to the truth about key issues of national security, including extraordinary rendition and torture.
He said: "It is regrettable that the shape of this Bill changes from week to week. Substantial changes to the Bill are being driven at the 11th hour. This remains a poorly made Bill and it would amount to poor legislation."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments