Serious child abuse inquiries 'inadequate'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than a third of inquiries into the most serious incidents of child abuse are "inadequate", inspectors have warned.
"Serious case reviews" are carried out by the local council after a child dies or is seriously injured through abuse or neglect – as in the Baby P tragedy. But Ofsted said these investigations were frequently sub-standard. A list published by the watchdog yesterday showed that 23 of the 64 serious case reviews it evaluated between December last year and February were "inadequate" – 36 per cent in total. It is understood that this number includes the evaluation of a serious case review into Baby P's death, carried out in December last year. A further 25 reviews (39 per cent) were considered "adequate" and 16 (25 per cent) were considered "good", according to Ofsted. Figures published last year in the 2008 Safeguarding Children joint chief inspectors' report revealed that between April and November, Ofsted judged one in four serious case reviews to be "inadequate". The shadow Children's minister, Tim Loughton, called again for the findings of serious case reviews to be published in full. Under current rules the full findings are confidential, and only a summary is published.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments