'Secret inquests' plan back on table
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Controversial plans to hold inquests in secret will be brought back today.
The changes were dropped from counter-terrorism laws last year alongside plans to detain suspects for 42 days.
Juries, relatives and the press could be excluded from inquests under the measures to be outlined by Justice Secretary Jack Straw.
The plans have provoked opposition from military families who fear relatives may be excluded from inquests into the deaths of their loved ones.
The Coroners and Justice Bill will also contain sweeping changes to murder laws.
Battered wives who kill their husbands will be able to claim a partial defence of "fear of serious violence".
But anyone who discovered their partner was having an affair could not claim they had been "seriously wronged".
Current laws require victims of domestic violence to have acted on the spur of the moment, but the new law would allow them to cite the "slow burn" of attacks over a period of time.
A successful defence would see them punished for manslaughter rather than murder.
Ministers believe the law has made it too easy in the past for men to kill their wives and claim they were provoked by her infidelity, but restricted defences for women with abusive partners.
They have said the changes will not allow "cold, calculating killers" to get away with their crimes.
The two partial defences to replace provocation will be killing in response to a fear of serious violence and killing in response to "words or actions" which caused the defendant to have a justifiable sense of being "seriously wronged".
Minister for Women Harriet Harman has said: "There's never any justification, however painful things are in a relationship, for a man who kills his wife to say: 'It's not my fault I killed her."'
"These men who have killed their wives, because she's going to leave him or she's having an affair, that centuries-old defence, it's long overdue, and we're going to abolish it."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments