John Major warns Boris Johnson will ‘provoke’ Scottish independence if he refuses second poll
‘Scotland cannot be kept forever in an arrangement if her people wish to end it,’ former Conservative prime minister says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.John Major is warning that Boris Johnson will “provoke” Scottish independence unless he engages with the crisis in the union to convince voters to reject it.
The SNP will be boosted if London simply refuses to allow a second poll without big changes to the devolution settlement – and if Scots are told they must “wait another generation”.
“Scotland cannot be kept forever in an arrangement if her people wish to end it,” the former Conservative prime minister has written.
“Boris Johnson probably has a legal right to refuse to sanction a second independence referendum. But he should be wary how he uses that power.
“It is unwise to dismiss Scottish ambitions, or to delay any vote, without action to expose the reality of separation – and remedy shortcomings in the UK’s devolution settlement.
Read more:
“A blunt refusal would be a still greater error if accompanied by the provocative assertion that Scots should wait another generation before voting again. Such a hardline approach is more likely to provoke a break-up than prevent it.”
The warning follows Mr Johnson’s branding of so-called “Indyref2” as “completely irrelevant” – when he suggested a 40-year gap between referendums.
It comes as the SNP is expected to triumph in May’s Holyrood elections, despite Nicola Sturgeon being weakened by the controversy of the Alex Salmond harassment allegations.
In a bitter civil war, the former first minister has now set up his own party to win a “super majority” for independence – but at the risk of depriving his old party of securing that by itself.
In the article for the Financial Times, Sir John joins Gordon Brown in calling for the UK government to order an “independent assessment of the pros and cons of separation”.
“If the two governments will not commission such studies, then their parliaments should – and academia, too,” the former Tory leader said.
“In parallel, the UK must address any constitutional amendments thought to be necessary by changed circumstances, frictions in the devolution settlements or the impact of Brexit.”
Sir John describes Scotland as a “proud nation perfectly capable of self-government” – but argues most Scots can be convinced to reject independence “with facts and reason”.
“The economic cost of separation would be harsh on Scotland. There is no longer an oil bonanza to boost the economy. The fiscal deficit is above 7 per cent of economic output,” the article said.
“Over 60 per cent of Scottish trade goes to the rest of the UK, three times her trade with the EU. Does Scotland really want a trade border with England?
“The ‘Barnett Formula’ boosts Scottish public spending by nearly £2,000 per person per year from Westminster. If lost, can Scottish taxpayers make up that sum? This is not Project Fear. It is reality.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments