Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rules were broken over free rail tickets for lover

Ben Russell,Political Correspondent
Wednesday 22 December 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Blunkett broke parliamentary rules by giving Kimberly Quinn two first-class rail tickets intended for use by MPs' spouses, the Commons standards watchdog found yesterday.

Members of the all-party Standards and Privileges Committee said the former home secretary was responsible for checking the rules governing travel passes and upheld a complaint against him. But they did not recommend action against Mr Blunkett after he repaid the £179 cost of the tickets and made a "profuse apology" for his error.

The all-party committee issued its finding after Sir Philip Mawer, the parliamentary commissioner for standards, had found Mr Blunkett was in "clear breach of the House's rules".

Spouses are entitled to 15 return trips a year between London and their constituency or home, but unmarried partners do not qualify.

Mr Blunkett said in a letter to Sir Philip that he had assumed partners had the same travel rights as spouses. The then Home Secretary said: "I considered Ms Fortier, as she was then known, to be my partner, although she remained married to someone else, given that she was eight months pregnant with my child."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in