Royal Free Hospital bans political visits
It says: “Temperatures can become raised during election campaigns”
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Politicians from all parties love to be seen posing for photographs as they drink tea with dedicated nurses or confer with wise doctors in Britain’s hospitals. But those aspiring to high office won’t be welcome at one North London hospital in the run up to next year’s general election.
Health bosses at the Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead have banned politicians for using the site “for political ends” after a report found visiting parliamentary candidates had a “significant impact” on the NHS trust’s workload during the 2005 election campaign.
Next year politicians will be banned from kissing new-born babies and staging photo ops at the hospital for two months before the general election in May, according to the Camden New Journal.
Official purdah rules already bar hospitals and schools, as well as many other public institutions and bodies, from offering favourable publicity before election but the Royal Free Hospital wants to have a cast-iron strategy as “temperatures can become raised during election campaigns”.
The report added: “A candidate could arrive unannounced at one of our hospitals and, told what the policy was, seek publicity for the fact that s/he had been ‘refused entry’ to a public building.”
Hospitals can prove tricky for politicians even outside the campaign trail though. In 2011 a surgeon, David Nunn, destroyed a carefully orchestrated photo call for David Cameron and Nick Clegg at Guy’s Hospital in London. In an angry televised outburst he attacked the politicians’ aides and camera crew for not having their sleeves up against hygiene regulations, but was reportedly placed on gardening leave by the following week.
A spokesperson for the hospital said: “This was a renewal of an existing policy put in place in 2009 in order to ensure the trust abides by Cabinet Office guidance to the civil service regarding the pre-election period known as “purdah” by preventing it from being used for political ends.
“Pre-election guidance states that a candidate’s request to visit a particular section of the trust may be granted only if the same opportunity is granted to all rival candidates, which could potentially cause significant disruption to the service.
“A policy was therefore put in place by the hospital board to safeguard the trust’s political impartiality while minimising disruption and ensuring the smooth running of our hospital services.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments