‘Rough sex defence’ to be banned, says justice minister
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The government will ban the “rough sex defence” under new domestic abuse legislation, a justice minister has indicated.
Alex Chalk MP accepted it was wrong for defendants to suggest that the death of a woman was excusable because she consented to violent sexual activity.
“That is unconscionable, and the government are committed to making that crystal clear,” he told a meeting of the Public Bill Committee.
However he said that care had to be taken to prevent a change in law creating loopholes or leading to unintended consequences.
“The law of homicide is of labyrinthine complexity, so there is a need to ensure that any statutory provisions have the desired effect,” he said.
Mr Chalk was responding to a proposed amendment to the Domestic Abuse Bill, which is due to come into force later this year.
The amendment was put forward by Labour MP Jess Phillips, who suggested that a clause be added stating “it is not a defence to a prosecution that [the alleged victim] consented to the infliction of injury or asphyxiation”.
After hearing the minister’s assurances, Ms Phillips commented on Twitter: “This is thanks to all those who spoke up and campaigned.”
The “rough sex” defence was highlighted in the high profile trial of the killer of British backpacker Grace Millane in New Zealand. His defence lawyer argued that Millane had died accidentally in a “sex game gone wrong” after she had pursued BDSM-style sex.
Campaign group We Can’t Consent To This, which has catalogued more than 60 cases where the killers of women had used the excuse, welcomed Mr Chalk’s comments as “tentatively very good news”.
“We do not know what the Government’s proposals will be but the clues are that this will be good, strong, far reaching provision,” it tweeted. “We will obviously point out if it’s lacking in any way.”
One of the leaders of the group, Louise Perry, has previously told The Independent that the defence was also resulting in reduced sentences.
“Killers are becoming increasingly aware of this defence,” she said. “Lawyers aren’t meant to propose it but people are aware of it, and its potential success.
“Men have always murdered women, this is just a new way of getting rid of them.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments