Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Right To Buy extension is politics of Mugabe, says one of David Cameron's former ministers

Ed Davey said the planned policy was 'shameful'

Jon Stone
Tuesday 22 September 2015 18:21 BST
Comments
Social housing could be sold off at an even faster pace under the policy
Social housing could be sold off at an even faster pace under the policy (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government’s planned extension of Right To Buy to housing associations resembles the politics Robert Mugabe, one of David Cameron’s former cabinet ministers has said.

Ed Davey, a former Liberal Democrat MP who was energy secretary in the 2010 Coalition cabinet, criticised the plan to force the landlords to sell off homes.

“The Tory policy of selling housing associations is Mugabe. That's not acceptable, it's shameful,” he told a fringe meeting at the Liberal Democrat conference in Bournemouth.

Ed Davey was energy secretary in the coalition
Ed Davey was energy secretary in the coalition (PA)

Housing associations are private not-for-profit landlords that manage social housing. The organisations take allocations from the social housing waiting list but also let properties on the open market.

Critics says extending Right To Buy to them amounts to forcing a private organisation to sell its property at a discount.

David Cameron last week erroneously referred to housing associations as “part of the public sector”.

The associations borrow against the value of future homes to fund building programmes and they say the extension will cripple their ability to raise finances and build new homes. Some have said they could challenge the extension of Right To Buy in the courts if it goes ahead.

The respected Institute for Fiscal Studies confirmed in April that the extension policy would likely lead to more government debt and fewer homes being built.

“Given this uncertainty, and the coalition’s less-than-impressive record in delivering replacement social housing under the existing Right to Buy, there is a risk that these policies will lead to a further depletion of the social housing stock – something the proposal explicitly seeks to avoid,” the Institute said.

Right To Buy was introduced in the 1980s under the pretext that it would make home ownership more widely available.

Homes sold under the policy have however tended to end up being let back to tenants by private landlords who buy them up.

Figures compiled in August show that nearly 40 per cent of homes sold under the policy are now being let by private landlords.

Furthermore, only one in ten homes sold off under Right To Buy is actually being replaced, despite a pledge by the Coalition to replace 100 per cent.

The Government says the policy gives more people the opportunity of home ownership.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in